Timeline for What is the C++ equivalent of a logging facade in Java?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2019 at 15:29 | comment | added | hyde | Logging facades are kinda solution to the logging system mess of Java, as well as advanced library repository systems like Maven's and Gradles, with differeny libraries using different logging. C++ as such doesn't have a similar logging ecosystem. For Linux/Mac/Unix look into syslog. | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 22:11 | comment | added | Nick Alexeev | related: See Logging for Libraries overview in this post (written from the .NET perspective). | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:18 | comment | added | Deduplicator | Not really. Or at least not completely. It's both a compile-time question (what logging is compiled in) and a run-time question (what logging is skipped / discarded). | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:01 | vote | accept | ruipacheco | ||
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:00 | vote | accept | ruipacheco | ||
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:00 | |||||
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:00 | comment | added | ruipacheco | That's what log levels are for, no? | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 15:49 | answer | added | axl | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 15:45 | comment | added | Deduplicator | In the debug build, it might make sense for you to log something. Maybe. Are you sure you are qualified to determine what should be, and can be, logged, without too much overhead? | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 15:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 6, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
| Jan 26, 2019 at 14:22 | history | asked | ruipacheco | CC BY-SA 4.0 |