Skip to main content
26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Nov 10, 2017 at 13:04 review Reopen votes
Nov 10, 2017 at 18:00
Nov 10, 2017 at 13:01 history closed gnat
Daenyth
Thomas Owens
Opinion-based
Nov 10, 2017 at 1:49 history protected CommunityBot
Nov 9, 2017 at 22:12 answer added Nat timeline score: 12
Nov 9, 2017 at 21:44 comment added JAB @RobertHarvey The implementation of default methods in interfaces starting with Java 8 means multiple inheritance has become quite easy to use in Java, at that.
Nov 9, 2017 at 21:07 comment added Tobia Tesan @TheodorosChatzigiannakis yes.
S Nov 9, 2017 at 20:53 history edited Jay Elston CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarity and grammar.
S Nov 9, 2017 at 20:53 history suggested marley CC BY-SA 3.0
Clarity and grammar.
Nov 9, 2017 at 19:28 answer added Akumaburn timeline score: -1
Nov 9, 2017 at 18:35 comment added Theodoros Chatzigiannakis For your own good, pay no attention to the people who think that a language must have all the features of C++ to be considered "real" and "complete". Pay no attention to the people who think that type safety, memory safety and well defined behavior are "training wheels". Correctness is becoming the most important aspect of software in most industries and the people who take pride in not caring about it will soon become irrelevant.
Nov 9, 2017 at 17:19 comment added Mark Rogers The statement is missing the point in that, even if you can handle it, you don't always want to expose every possible aspect of software development in a language. Sure you may not have a problem reading memory management code, but other developers may not be incredibly excited to maintain that code. Its similar to the concept of encapsulation. Also C# does let you access quite a bit of stuff through, compiler directives, special attributes, and reflection, not that one should use those things, though.
Nov 9, 2017 at 16:49 answer added Wes Toleman timeline score: 3
Nov 9, 2017 at 16:36 comment added Robert Harvey @GoatInTheMachine: You can do multiple inheritance in Java and C#; it just requires a lot of unnecessary plumbing.
Nov 9, 2017 at 16:29 comment added FGreg Just FYI - Oracle might not own Java in the near future: blogs.oracle.com/theaquarium/opening-up-ee-update
Nov 9, 2017 at 16:08 review Suggested edits
S Nov 9, 2017 at 20:53
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:45 comment added JacquesB The context of the quote is missing (the link is 404), so the only thing you will get here is people guessing at what he probably meant, or (more likely) people just presenting their own opinion. If you actually want to know the context, i.e. what is on the lost page, the best bet is probably to write the author directly, or maybe try to find the lost page through the wayback machine or similar.
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:38 answer added Jörg W Mittag timeline score: 34
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:37 answer added GoatInTheMachine timeline score: 23
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:30 answer added Walfrat timeline score: 1
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:29 review Close votes
S Nov 10, 2017 at 13:04
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:18 vote accept 123iamking
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:08 answer added Kilian Foth timeline score: 163
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:07 comment added GoatInTheMachine I'm not sure exactly, because the article he's quoting from seems to be dead, but it seems like he's saying that Java and C# are missing a number of C++'s more 'dangerous' or controversial features, like multiple inheritance or template metaprogramming.
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:07 comment added Kayaman I interpreted that as critique against letting the programmer do things like freely allocate and free memory and that sort of "protection", but I'm not sure if that was the point he was trying to make.
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:02 review First posts
Nov 9, 2017 at 19:14
Nov 9, 2017 at 14:01 history asked 123iamking CC BY-SA 3.0