Timeline for Calculating cyclomatic complexity/ mccab's number
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 at 9:35 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 2, 2017 at 9:36 | |||||
| May 20, 2017 at 19:33 | history | edited | user7943804 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 168 characters in body
|
| May 20, 2017 at 10:46 | history | edited | user7943804 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 62 characters in body
|
| May 20, 2017 at 5:38 | answer | added | Steve Barnes | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 20, 2017 at 5:18 | comment | added | amon | I also get 3 for the code shown. But why is that supposed to be wrong? Please explain. Also, the flowchart seems to be totally unrelated with the code, why are you showing it? | |
| May 20, 2017 at 3:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 16, 2017 at 10:20 | |||||
| May 20, 2017 at 3:39 | comment | added | John R. Strohm | Don't bother. MCC (McCabe Cyclic Complexity) has been shown to be VERY strongly correlated with raw SLOC, when run against real code from one of the BIG repositories. (We're talking MILLIONS of SLOC here.) | |
| May 20, 2017 at 3:30 | history | asked | user7943804 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |