Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    I'm not sure the normal distribution allows us to make an inference as you're suggesting. I assume we're analysing defect density per code unit. For any non-uniform probability distribution, we can see that some units will be more buggy than others. For symmetric distributions like the normal distribution, exactly half of all modules will have above-average defect density! Of course, that's a consequence of assuming a constant risk of bugs across all units—but isn't that the opposite of what this question is about, that bugs breed more bugs? Maybe I misunderstood this answer. Commented Nov 16, 2016 at 18:12
  • "exactly half of..." yes, but it has no value in the current context. Sorry, I did not get understand you Amon. I don't agree with exact phrase "bugs breed more bugs". My point is that a bug found is [with probability we can't ignore] destined to be among others. Commented Nov 18, 2016 at 16:20