Timeline for Should Microservice still use web framework such as Spring
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2016 at 7:25 | answer | added | Walfrat | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 14, 2016 at 6:55 | answer | added | jwenting | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 16:29 | history | edited | InformedA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2016 at 16:16 | history | edited | InformedA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 104 characters in body
|
| Sep 13, 2016 at 16:03 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | That's a tautology. What is your specific criteria that fulfills the objective of "still makes sense together?" Availability of programmers with the necessary skills? Smallest code? Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound? You can also help us identify your notion of relevance by answering the question "why" to the assertion "I think only SpringBoot with Bean injection and JPA persistence support are still relevant." | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 16:00 | comment | added | InformedA | @RobertHarvey "relevant" means "still makes sense together". Microservices with Spring MVC, do they make sense together? | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 15:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 28, 2016 at 3:05 | |||||
| Sep 13, 2016 at 15:40 | comment | added | Robert Harvey | What does "relevant" mean? | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 13:35 | comment | added | ASA | They even have blog posts about this topic: spring.io/blog/2015/07/14/microservices-with-spring | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 12:28 | history | asked | InformedA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |