Timeline for What are the consequences of no virtual destructor for this base class?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Aug 18, 2016 at 1:52 | comment | added | Bwmat | The line "base &bb{ d+1 };" won't compile unless you change it to be a const reference (in a standard conforming compiler), and in that case, the temporary is guaranteed to be destroyed correctly when the reference goes out of scope. | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 16:48 | history | edited | Jerry Coffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 236 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 16:13 | history | edited | Jerry Coffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 16:05 | history | answered | Jerry Coffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |