Skip to main content
Software Engineering

Return to Question

Grammatical/clarity improvements.
Source Link
edit approved Aug 11, 2016 at 20:35
jscs
edit approved Aug 11, 2016 at 20:35
jscs
  • 848
  • 9
  • 17

How to force Force implementation of transparentan interface to use a function, to enable functionality that's transparent to the user

Suppose I haveam the designer of an interface IModel, which someone has to use (the one who implementswill be used by the implementer of a the controller (MVC)) and assume it. The interface contains funcA(). in the other side aAnother programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish isI want to direct the programmer who implementsimplementation of funcA() by implementation ofto use another function, funcB(). Another case is forcing transparentThis forces some functionality of the specific "IModel"model class to be transparent. For For example, the interface contains openFile(), but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (theencrypting the file).

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use itthe controller side, and otheranother one, I2, for those who implement the specificmodel class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean, where I2 extends I1.
  2. OwnMy own implementation of an abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract functionfunctions.

How to force implementation of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which someone has to use (the one who implements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. Another case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". For example the interface contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. Own implementation of abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.

Force implementation of an interface to use a function, to enable functionality that's transparent to the user

I am the designer of an interface IModel, which will be used by the implementer of a the controller (MVC). The interface contains funcA(). Another programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel.

I want to direct the implementation of funcA() to use another function, funcB(). This forces some functionality of the specific model class to be transparent. For example, the interface contains openFile(), but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encrypting the file.

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: I1 for the controller side, and another one, I2, for those who implement the model class, where I2 extends I1.
  2. My own implementation of an abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract functions.
fixed the typos missed by the last editor....
Source Link
edit approved Aug 11, 2016 at 18:45
Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩
edit approved Aug 11, 2016 at 18:45
Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩
  • 347
  • 2
  • 13

How to force implementaionimplementation of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which someone has to use (the one who implements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. Another case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". For example the interface contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. Own implementation of abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.

thanks ofek

How to force implementaion of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which someone has to use (the one who implements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. Another case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". For example the interface contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. Own implementation of abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.

thanks ofek

How to force implementation of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which someone has to use (the one who implements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. Another case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". For example the interface contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. Own implementation of abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.
added 31 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Tulains Córdova
Tulains Córdova
  • 39.6k
  • 13
  • 102
  • 157

How to forcingforce implementaion of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModelIModel which some onesomeone has to use it (the one who implementimplements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA()funcA(). in the other side a programmer needneeds to implement a specific class for the IModelIModel. I'm the one who designdesigns the interface and I want to force the implementimplementation of funcBfuncB.

myMy wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcAfuncA by implementation of funcBfuncB. otherAnother case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel""IModel". forFor example the interface contain openFile()contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

whatWhat is better?

  1. defineDefining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. own implemnetationOwn implementation of abstract calssclass like AbsModelAbsModel which implements ImodelImodel and contains abstract function.

thanks ofek

How to forcing implementaion of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which some one has to use it (the one who implement the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer need to implement specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who design the interface and I want to force the implement of funcB.

my wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. other case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". for example the interface contain openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

what is better?

  1. define two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. own implemnetation of abstract calss like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.

thanks ofek

How to force implementaion of transparent functionality

Suppose I have an interface IModel which someone has to use (the one who implements the controller (MVC)) and assume it contains funcA(). in the other side a programmer needs to implement a specific class for the IModel. I'm the one who designs the interface and I want to force the implementation of funcB.

My wish is to direct the programmer who implements funcA by implementation of funcB. Another case is forcing transparent functionality of the specific "IModel". For example the interface contains openFile() but the specific class must contain the transparent functionality of encription (the file)

What is better?

  1. Defining two interfaces: one I1 for those who use it and other one for those who implement the specific class.
    when I1 <-- I2 mean I2 extends I1.
  2. Own implementation of abstract class like AbsModel which implements Imodel and contains abstract function.

thanks ofek

Source Link
Ofek Israel
Ofek Israel
  • 19
  • 2