Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • Only answer to mention the widely recognized term effectful and it gets down voted.... Ignorance is bliss I suppose. .. Commented May 2, 2016 at 22:24
  • "effectful" is a word that the author of that post co-opted to mean "having side-effects." He says so himself. Commented May 4, 2016 at 1:11
  • 1
    Googling effectful function reveals plenty of evidence its a widely used term. The blog post was given as one of many examples, not as the definition. In the functional programming circles where pure functions are the default, there's a need for a positive term to describe deliberately side-effecting functions. Ie more than just the absence of purity. Effectful is that term. Now, consider yourself educated. Commented May 4, 2016 at 3:35
  • Meh. Commented May 4, 2016 at 4:05