Skip to main content

Timeline for How did JavaScript become popular?

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 5, 2013 at 16:57 comment added Erik Reppen IMO, there were other alternatives and there would have been more serious competition if JS hadn't been good at the problem domain. Nothing in heavy use normalizes and reduces complexity like JS does.
Dec 22, 2010 at 5:08 comment added chrisaycock My comments are getting a bit big, so I spun this out as another answer: programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/28947/…
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:45 comment added chrisaycock @Mathnerd314 Current emerging frontiers include multicore and cloud computing. Indeed, this is something that a language like Erlang could capitalize on. (Another example is the rise of Objective-C because of the emergence of smartphones, since Apple is such a big player in that space.)
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:17 vote accept Mathnerd314
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:19
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:15 comment added Mathnerd314 In order to recreate the success, I need to find an entirely new frontier of computing, and make the new language mandatory. I see...
Dec 22, 2010 at 4:07 comment added chrisaycock @Mathnerd314 It's not so much the piggybacking as it was the only real language for a new frontier of computing, just as C was for Unix. Anyone who wanted a dynamic front-end was required to use JavaScript.
Dec 22, 2010 at 3:58 comment added Dean Harding @Mathnerd314: It's not quite like that. JavaScript (thanks, Mr. CRT :p) was never separate from the browser: it was developed by Netscape specifically for use in their browser, so it's not like there was a concious decision to "piggyback" on Netscape's popularity in order to make the language popular.
Dec 22, 2010 at 3:53 comment added Mathnerd314 So, by piggybacking on an existing (popular) piece of software that needed a higher-level language?
Dec 22, 2010 at 3:50 history edited Shog9 CC BY-SA 2.5
Fixed typos
Dec 22, 2010 at 3:26 history answered Dean Harding CC BY-SA 2.5