Skip to main content
Software Engineering

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • 2
    This was my thought also. There's no other way to measure the value of tests. Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 20:55
  • 2
    Yes, "good testing" is such a subjective thing it needs considered judging, either by peers or respected authorities. Chasing metrics will just lead to a lot of wasted effort and little real value. Might be interesting to have multiple prizes: most imaginative test, a "testing something previously considered untestable" award, best performance test, most effective test, most obscure test, cleverest test, most valuable test, test most likely to be appreciated by end users... Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 23:18