Timeline for Unit Testing Competition
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 20, 2015 at 4:25 | comment | added | JeffC | I'm with Thomas... the winner should be the code base/customer because the code quality improved. Set an overall/group goal based on code coverage of the unit tests... +5% over current or whatever. ... and don't game the system for prizes... whatever happened to a job well done is its own reward? | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 7:39 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jun 29, 2015 at 13:31 | |||||
| Jun 20, 2015 at 12:08 | audit | First posts | |||
| Jun 20, 2015 at 12:08 | |||||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 11:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/606061315170418688 | ||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 6:54 | history | reopened |
Doc Brown yannis |
||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 6:14 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 7:00 | |||||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 6:04 | history | edited | Doc Brown | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Explained why the "dupe" is not a dupe.
|
| Jun 3, 2015 at 4:24 | history | closed |
gnat Ixrec Telastyn CommunityBot durron597 |
Duplicate of What should you test with unit tests? | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 21:32 | answer | added | Mike Nakis | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:53 | answer | added | Arseni Mourzenko | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:53 | answer | added | Doc Brown | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:47 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 3, 2015 at 4:24 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:36 | comment | added | Thomas Owens♦ | Would it be considered an improvement to not make it a competition? Why does everything have to be a competition? Why can't you collaborate? Maybe getting rid some of your more pointless unit tests and building a nice suite of useful smoke and regression tests would be helpful. | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:35 | history | edited | Shaun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 353 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | Shaun | Again, no. I realized they can be gamed. I have no control over this competition but was asked "how can we do this better" | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:30 | comment | added | user7043 | You don't seem to quite realize the full extent yet. Any measure of who wrote the best test cases will either be completely subjective or have these problems to some degree. What metric works best will depend on your goals for this competitions and on how mature (i.e., unlikely to exploit the scoring rather than writing the best tests they can) the contestants are. | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:27 | comment | added | Shaun | Not quite. I realized it from the start | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:27 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:49 | |||||
| Jun 2, 2015 at 20:22 | history | asked | Shaun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |