Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • You're probably right about the second choice being better if possible. I could probably use that in some cases where I've run across this. Also, It occurred to me that you could collapse the third option into a single pattern match by wildcarding one of the values after the correct match. Commented Apr 9, 2015 at 22:49
  • The missing type is absolutely the best answer, @MI3Guy. It offers the simplest, clearest, safest code. Commented Apr 13, 2015 at 10:08