Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • I agree that this isn't RESTful but may be useful. I think you should advise a PUT though, because this is probably idempotent but not nullimpotent. Commented Nov 3, 2014 at 21:01
  • @Aaron, the comparison of idempotent and nullimpotent is all well and good, but how do you determine when it's notimpotent? Commented Jul 30, 2015 at 20:01
  • @Craig it's idempotent if running it many times has the same effect of running it once. It's nullipotent if running it once or many times has the same effect on the server as running it zero times. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idempotence Commented Aug 1, 2015 at 4:21
  • 8
    @AaronGreenwald “notimpotent” [not-im-poht-nt] [not-im-pawr-tnt] - adjective - 1. A play on words, “not important,” antonym of the adjective “important.” 2. Humor… ;-) Commented Aug 1, 2015 at 6:32
  • 2
    I definitely wouldn't use GET - it's the kind of thing that will work in your development environment but once you go into production you find it's getting cached somewhere by a proxy server you didn't know existed Commented Jan 24, 2024 at 12:09