Timeline for Is there a 'standard' SQL that can replace all the various custom versions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 at 7:34 | comment | added | gbjbaanb | You can level the same argument against any standard, be it HTML, OpenGL or C. The fact that its difficult to make 1 thing fit every vendor's desire for differentiation doesn't mean its not a good thing to have. | |
| Oct 3, 2014 at 6:58 | comment | added | user82096 | I don't think ANSI SQL was ever the answer. The standard is too large, omits certain important behaviors, and is too vague on key questions. This is one reason that vendor implementations differ so much. Also, while standardized SQL would be a nice start, there would still be a need for a "different query language" that overcomes some of SQL's maddening limitations. | |
| S Oct 3, 2014 at 6:24 | history | suggested | curtisk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small typos
|
| Oct 3, 2014 at 5:27 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 3, 2014 at 6:24 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2014 at 3:46 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2014 at 19:15 | history | answered | Michael Durrant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |