Timeline for Why does Haskell's built in max function run faster than mine?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 14:09 | comment | added | Carcigenicate | Thank you. I've always thought of compilation as outputting to machine code, so I learned something here. | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 14:08 | vote | accept | Carcigenicate | ||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 6:56 | comment | added | user7043 | RE interpreting compiled code: That does make sense when one lifts the (kinda silly) restriction that "compilation" must refer to something that output machine code. A translation into bytecode is also a compiler (even most of the internals are exactly the same), yet the result must be interpreted. Unless you defictionalize the VM architecture set by casting it into silicon. Which some people consider "building specialized interpreter hardware". | |
| S Jul 8, 2014 at 6:07 | history | suggested | Foole | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammatical errors
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 3:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 8, 2014 at 6:07 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 2:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/486335039974952960 | ||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 1:41 | answer | added | fgv | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 8, 2014 at 1:28 | history | edited | Carcigenicate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 507 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 1:09 | history | edited | Carcigenicate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 0:30 | history | edited | user40980 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small numbers get spelled out. Remove thanks (see http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2950/ ), the url parser is fairly smart (no extra whitespace needed).
|
| Jul 8, 2014 at 0:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 0:31 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2014 at 0:09 | history | asked | Carcigenicate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |