Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

1
  • 3
    I'll agree with this, because it's explicitly invoking the reason @SnoopDougieDoug cited as the best reason not to do so: Future naming conflicts. In this case, you want the conflict so your code will transition seamlessly when you are able to move to the higher version. Commented May 21, 2014 at 21:26