Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

13
  • 5
    There seems to be a valid question in there, but it is hard to read around the rant that is there also. Can you reformulate your question such that it doesn't read like an anti-asp.net rant? Commented Oct 22, 2013 at 5:57
  • 3
    I don't see the valid question. Using ViewState is optional and ASP.NET works with AJAX and JSON. Commented Oct 22, 2013 at 6:16
  • It's really hard to point out something you see as a flaw without making it a rant. I really tried, and it seems that I failed. I would gladly accept any more specific pointers on how to rewrite it better (as I'm interested in good answers I will of course try to formulate as good question as I can). Commented Oct 22, 2013 at 6:19
  • Please excuse the somewhat rantish question. This overture does not excuse the "rantish" question. Also, ASP.NET Web Forms is yesterday's news. Prefer ASP.BET MVC. Always. Commented Oct 22, 2013 at 6:31
  • 3
    @iveqy: Language matters. Believe me - I get fired up about poor frameworks too (and ironically, PHP is one of them!). And in a chat room you're perfectly free to say that something "sucks", but not here, not in a question. You'd be better off if you reworded your confusion with and criticism of ASP.NET Web Forms in a much more objective manner. Commented Oct 22, 2013 at 6:39