Timeline for DDD Bounded Contexts & Domains?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:36 | comment | added | Vadim Samokhin | I guess you already realized why it is profitable to split your domain on contexts. So what could be useful now is the right way to identify them, to define the context's boundaries. Here is how I do it: medium.com/@wrong.about/… | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 16:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackProgrammer/status/781170354492477440 | ||
| Sep 26, 2016 at 10:23 | comment | added | Ashley Aitken | It seems to me that the only thing defining separate bounded contexts is the need to differentiate linguistics and associated operational differences, i.e. it's called product in one area and product in another area but they are different, so we need two products and they both can't be in the same model (same name etc). So why don't we just change the names to represent their subtly different semantics? They we could have one model to rule them all. Subdomains are natural but I am not seeing bounded contexts at the moment. Just thinking aloud here... | |
| Oct 15, 2013 at 20:28 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 15, 2013 at 20:29 | |||||
| Oct 8, 2013 at 21:28 | answer | added | Alexey Zimarev | timeline score: 19 | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 18:20 | vote | accept | lko | ||
| Oct 4, 2013 at 18:01 | answer | added | Adrian Schneider | timeline score: 23 | |
| Oct 4, 2013 at 17:34 | history | asked | lko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |