Timeline for Should I write a wrapper within a manager object?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2024 at 16:52 | answer | added | user453443 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 22:04 | answer | added | Doc Brown | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 17:40 | comment | added | Steve P. | Gotcha. Never used that terminology before. Have you considered asking a similar question on StackOverflow? | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 17:37 | comment | added | sinθ | @SteveP. As in "Getters and Setters"? It just means ways of accessing instance variables through methods. stackoverflow.com/questions/1568091/why-use-getters-and-setters | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 17:30 | comment | added | Steve P. | @MikeG, okay, that makes sense. What exactly do you mean by "getters?" | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 17:26 | comment | added | sinθ | @SteveP. Because every time I add another method to one of the classes or change an argument, I'll need to update the other class as well. | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 16:40 | comment | added | Steve P. | Why is the latter option far more maintainable? I'm not an expert by any means, but the former seems like the natural choice for me. | |
| S Jun 8, 2013 at 7:32 | history | suggested | JustinC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting
|
| Jun 8, 2013 at 5:59 | comment | added | JustinC | I reformatted your example a bit, to help visually clarify it; however, I think there might be a couple points that need to be technically sorted out in your example. Is the ListManager actually the TriggerManager, and should the second of three items being stored, the TriggerManager, instead be a Trigger? | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 5:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 8, 2013 at 7:32 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2013 at 23:04 | history | asked | sinθ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |