Timeline for Manage version control with a central development server (LAMP)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2018 at 23:08 | comment | added | Marnen Laibow-Koser | Downvoting. In 2013, DVCS of some sort is absolutely standard, and Git is the most popular DVCS. | |
| Apr 13, 2013 at 19:36 | comment | added | Lazy Badger | @MarcelGwerder - another systems are not better for your purpose (any SCM with good merging will satisfy you, and Git's merge /in common sense/ is better than svn's), they can give you just less headache and more easier learning curve, than Git. I touched Git, I use Subversion and Mercurial, without strong reasoning I'll never select Git as SCM of my choice (SVN for linear history and minimal concurrent changes, Mercurial in any more hard case) | |
| Apr 13, 2013 at 18:50 | comment | added | Marcel Gwerder | Maybe that first phrase you've quoted was a bit wrong or ambiguous. I don't care about how many "people" are git fanboys. It's just that if you search the web for things like "git vs. svn" or anything like that most of the bloggers/commentators/askers etc. are pro git and think it's the better SCM. I won't hesitate to use another system if it's better suited for our purpose. | |
| Apr 13, 2013 at 18:31 | history | answered | Lazy Badger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |