Timeline for Why does Java allow to implement different interfaces, each containing a method with the same signature?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2024 at 15:07 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 17, 2012 at 5:11 | vote | accept | dhblah | ||
| Dec 2, 2012 at 12:20 | comment | added | dhblah | I just meant that a third interface extending both that interfaces will contain both methods from that interfaces which is actually a single method. And that's I can't undertand too. | |
| Nov 29, 2012 at 3:29 | answer | added | Luiz Angelo | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Nov 28, 2012 at 19:01 | history | suggested | Suman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Major grammatical fixes
|
| Nov 28, 2012 at 18:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 28, 2012 at 19:01 | |||||
| Nov 28, 2012 at 17:53 | answer | added | Bill K | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 15:27 | comment | added | gnat | "Eclipse only can find out about implementations for only one interface method, but for the second one it doesn't show any implementations at all" if this is so, that's a bug in Eclipse | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 13:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/273773769296838656 | ||
| Nov 28, 2012 at 11:54 | comment | added | maple_shaft♦ |
And then I can have an interface or class that implements both of that interfaces. Interfaces don't implement anything, they declare or extend other interfaces. Only a class implements a method signature and if it implements the same method signature of a base class then it overrides it.
|
|
| Nov 28, 2012 at 11:52 | answer | added | Kilian Foth | timeline score: 24 | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 11:51 | answer | added | Random42 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 11:50 | answer | added | K.Steff | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 11:29 | history | asked | dhblah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |