Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • So in essence we will create a different object for each simple type that we can expect. So I could create a Value object that has the restraint of being non-negative and then use that as the parameter instead. Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 20:04
  • 1
    Wouldn't it be better to verify that you have the proper parameter types at compile time than at run time? That removes the validation from the function and there is no run-time overhead. I would take Jon's answer one step further and say that you are longing for a type-safe language (e.g. Java). An object-oriented type-safe language lets you define your own types so that you can do Jon's example of Area area(Length w, Length height). Type-safety and OO are wonderful things. Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 20:41
  • I agree with Glen. Try Java. It isn't bad, really. It may be quite a change from PHP, but better in almost every way. Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 22:06
  • @GlenPeterson: As a Haskeller, I do prefer static typing. The OP asked about PHP, so I answered from that perspective. PHP has object-oriented features and allows user-defined types. Java is not a credible alternative in this case. Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 22:06
  • What do you mean when you say, "Java is not a credible alternative in this case?" Do you mean that Java has no good HTML front-end (aka JSP/JSF suck)? Yeah, that's an issue. Also, what is it with this list and Haskell. I hadn't even heard of Haskell until I started hanging out here, and now it seems everyone is into it. It seems a little theoretical to me. Commented Sep 5, 2012 at 22:29