Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • 17
    Here's a few: SEO, web aggregators, screen readers, NoScript, curl, mobile browsers. I disable scripts by default, and most of the internet still works just fine. Commented Aug 29, 2012 at 6:48
  • 7
    If a site isn't usable without javascript then it can't be effectively crawled by Google, and it may or may not be usable in a RESTful context. Even Facebook is at least minimally usable without javascript Commented Aug 29, 2012 at 7:30
  • 9
    I agree with most of what is said here, but I strongly object to the idea that a site should be "at least minimally usable without JavaScript". That's wrong: it should be maximally usable without JavaScript. Commented Aug 29, 2012 at 11:06
  • 4
    @JörgWMittag if you're going to disable a web technology, you should not expect to get the full benefits of the website. Scenarios differ, but if I'm building a web app I'm probably not wasting my time building in full compatibility for a minority of my users who refuse to move to the 21st century. Similar to how I don't support IE 6 in most of my projects. Commented Sep 1, 2012 at 17:26
  • 2
    It's only profesional to support all use cases. If you missed it, that's alright, everyone errs once in a while, but neglecting them is a different problem. I'm all in for developing websites 100% WITHOUT JS, and after making it work, add the JS to streamline tasks and make the UX better. Commented Nov 10, 2012 at 23:20