Timeline for Why is there no service-oriented language?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2012 at 17:52 | vote | accept | Wolfgang | ||
| Jun 24, 2012 at 15:19 | answer | added | Michael Brown | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 20:59 | comment | added | Danny Varod | adding remote access to CB makes it SOA. That was my point. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 20:53 | comment | added | Wolfgang | CB also supports remote access. See EJB or CORBA or DCOM. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 17:36 | comment | added | Danny Varod | Component based architecture can be seen as disconnecting dependencies between classes using interfaces, thus enabling dependency injection. Service based architecture requires that but it also provides other requirements, since it supports service and clients being remote. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 14:14 | comment | added | Wolfgang | I tried for a long time to find a difference between CB and SO. Didn't find any feature of either one which the other one wouldn't also claim. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 14:13 | answer | added | user53019 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 14:07 | history | edited | Wolfgang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 308 characters in body
|
| Jun 23, 2012 at 14:03 | comment | added | Danny Varod | you might not defer between the two, but they are different. Read more on CB and its uses. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 14:01 | answer | added | Wolfgang | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/216524764745965570 | ||
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:31 | answer | added | user7071 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:19 | answer | added | Telastyn | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:17 | comment | added | Wolfgang | @Danny: I don't make a difference between CB and SOA. If you read the definitions of each of them, they are basically identical. CB is like pre-2000 and SOA i post-2000 because CB was considered "dead" at some point and nobody wanted to use the word anymore. I don't limit SOA to web services or such but refer to the programming paradigm. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:10 | comment | added | Danny Varod | Component-based architecture may be a requirement for SOA but SOA is not necessary for Component-based. OO systems that do not differ services from data structures can be Component-based too. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 13:01 | history | asked | Wolfgang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |