Timeline for Origin of structures and classes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2012 at 14:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/203851301057077248 | ||
| May 18, 2012 at 19:37 | history | edited | xralf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 185 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2012 at 19:37 | vote | accept | xralf | ||
| May 18, 2012 at 19:37 | comment | added | xralf | Thank you everybody for answers. The answers that mention IBM 1620, COBOL, Simula 67 and Giorgio's pedagogical explanation of principle create all the core of what I accept as answer. | |
| May 18, 2012 at 19:07 | answer | added | Giorgio | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 18, 2012 at 17:54 | history | edited | xralf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 185 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2012 at 17:53 | comment | added | chrisaycock | The history contest isn't for another two days. :) | |
| May 18, 2012 at 17:40 | history | edited | xralf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2012 at 16:56 | comment | added | user53141 |
They aren't as related as often thought, and the issue is muddied by the fact that C++ implemented classes by laying syntactic sugar over structs containing function pointers. To further muddy the waters, C++ expanded structs to include actual method definitions and then making the struct keyword optional when the struct is used.
|
|
| May 18, 2012 at 16:54 | answer | added | user28988 | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 18, 2012 at 16:50 | answer | added | scarfridge | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 18, 2012 at 16:38 | answer | added | Edward Strange | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 18, 2012 at 15:39 | history | edited | gnat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
personal stuff removed
|
| May 18, 2012 at 15:33 | history | asked | xralf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |