Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • +1! for "..you should be telling objects what to do ..". And "..thinking too low level.." Finally, kudos for the "minimize dots" heuristic. Nicely explained. Commented Apr 6, 2012 at 20:30
  • +1 for suggesting he think outside the low level box he's in and for the "why" and "what" to guide the process. Commented Apr 6, 2012 at 22:13
  • +1 for the higher level idea. Probably it would be the best to have a low level wrapper for the communication stuff PLUS an interface that defines high-level logic. These are two abstraction levels that deserve to be treated separately. Commented Apr 7, 2012 at 21:22