Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • Also, I would assume bugs in a static page would be MUCH easier to fix than logic errors, design errors, and the type of things TDD is normally used to prevent. Both discovering and fixing errors of static pages are likely to be fairly easy, and its my impression that TDD is used to shorten both of those processes when they take longer than is desired. :D Commented Mar 10, 2012 at 0:36
  • I wouldn't assume that. If you have ever dealt with obscure browser version behaviors or strange javascript memory issues you've likely gotten quite a workout. More sometimes as back end languages can be a little more reliable and standard. sometimes. Maybe you're talking about static as in html and no javascript though. Commented Mar 10, 2012 at 2:58