Timeline for At which point is a continuous integration server interesting?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Cedric Martin | ||
| Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Cedric Martin | ||
| Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2011 at 11:55 | comment | added | Cedric Martin | +1... OK now you're talking to me! The "not losing time doing builds" argument I like a lot. Our build is done several times daily and only takes one-click but... it is slower than running all the tests (so devs are losing time). Also, I like the idea of more complicated tests: this I see how we could benefit from a CI server. Regarding 2,3 and 10: yes, yes and yes (a single click on an Ant task)... But man, these 12 rules should be updated: do you use source control? I'd rather have non than CVS, for example ; ) (just half-kidding ; ) | |
| Nov 23, 2011 at 5:17 | history | edited | Merlyn Morgan-Graham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2011 at 5:12 | history | answered | Merlyn Morgan-Graham | CC BY-SA 3.0 |