Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • "The LGPL is inappropriate for statically linked [closed source] software" – that seems to be inaccurate, as in fact LGPL and static linking is legally possible (see). Commented May 31, 2020 at 2:35
  • Your position appears correct. See gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic But it's extra work and extra things to ship. Can you get away with it? Yes. Do you want to spend the effort? Possibly not. Commented Jun 12, 2020 at 3:59