Timeline for How does a programmer used to static languages cope with lack of Javascript tooling
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2013 at 11:09 | comment | added | funkybro | And no use if you're writing JS outwith the context of a browser | |
| May 2, 2013 at 22:37 | comment | added | Erik Reppen | Chrome/webkit does too. I actually write a lot of snippets in the console and then pass then just paste into my files and do find auto-complete convenient when doing so. Not a dealbreaker when comparing editors/IDEs though. | |
| May 2, 2013 at 22:25 | history | edited | Robert Harvey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| May 2, 2013 at 18:30 | comment | added | Izkata | Firebug has real autocomplete. It's not an IDE, but it's a step there. I don't know about Developer Tools on other browsers | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 9:17 | comment | added | funkybro | @SeanMcMillan Java also, see GWT developers.google.com/web-toolkit | |
| Jul 19, 2012 at 8:28 | comment | added | Den | @SeanMcMillan: some .NET(C#/F#) examples are jsil.org, projects.nikhilk.net/ScriptSharp, sharpkit.net, websharper.com | |
| Jul 18, 2012 at 16:32 | comment | added | Sean McMillan | @Den: Do you have a suggestion for a higher-level language with advanced tools? In my experience, advanced tools are made for popular languages. What higher-level language that compiles into javascript is popular enough to have such tools? | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 17:14 | comment | added | Den | "You have to learn to do without them." OR scrap it OR use higher-level language that generates javascript and has proper tools. | |
| Sep 28, 2011 at 14:35 | comment | added | funkybro | Accepting this one for constructive advice on how to deal with lack of tooling. | |
| Sep 28, 2011 at 6:54 | vote | accept | funkybro | ||
| Sep 27, 2011 at 13:05 | history | answered | Sean McMillan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |