Timeline for Why did Microsoft make parameters, local variables and private fields have the same name naming convention?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:39 | comment | added | Aaronaught | Um yeah, we didn't need a citation on what Hungarian notation is. The [citation needed] is for all of the dubious claims in your answer. | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 22:31 | history | edited | JaCraig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 733 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2011 at 21:04 | comment | added | Aaronaught | [citation needed] | |
| Aug 16, 2011 at 16:23 | comment | added | JaCraig | I never said that Microsoft came up with it. I actually said Charles Simonyi came up with it (specifically apps hungarian notation). Microsoft pushed it heavily, but I never said they created it (in fact I said I wasn't sure if he created it during his Xerox or Microsoft days). I was giving it as an example of something that a large company (Microsoft) suggested as the way things should be done. My point in all of this is the OP shouldn't worry about naming conventions that a company that he doesn't work for says is the "right way" (unless he works for Microsoft, in which case he should care). | |
| Aug 15, 2011 at 21:29 | comment | added | Aaronaught | 1) Hungarian was not invented by Microsoft, and 2) the "Hungarian" you're referring to is type Hungarian rather than semantic Hungarian. | |
| Aug 15, 2011 at 19:38 | history | answered | JaCraig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |