Timeline for Re-tagging text-processing questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2023 at 8:52 | vote | accept | AdminBee | ||
| Sep 27, 2021 at 14:48 | comment | added | AdminBee | @terdon Yeah, I guess you are right. Pointing people to this Q in case of objections will be the right thing to do. | |
| Sep 24, 2021 at 15:43 | comment | added | terdon Mod | @AdminBee well, deciding if there's a consensus or not is always hard. Among the people who have chosen to vote and/or answer here, there is a clear trend against using tool-specific tags when the question isn't about that tool but is that enough to call a site-wide consensus? That's always a tricky one. What we usually do is just point people to the meta discussion if they disagree and they can always post their own answer and see if it gets any traction. | |
| Sep 24, 2021 at 15:38 | comment | added | AdminBee | @terdon Do you think we have a consensus, then? If so, how would we formulate it? | |
| Sep 19, 2021 at 13:14 | comment | added | Braiam | @Quasímodo law.se don't even need it, as long as the jurisdiction is mentioned. The New York one for example, would still be clear is about NY, by the first sentence. so does Finland, Brazil, Israel (last two uses titles instead/too). As you can see, tag isn't any different than mentioning it in the answer body, and don't provide any useful metadata unlike it does in questions. | |
| Sep 17, 2021 at 13:58 | comment | added | terdon Mod | This. Tags don't make answers any more easy to find. | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 14:06 | history | answered | Braiam | CC BY-SA 4.0 |