Timeline for Are really valid questions that can have both [shell] and [bash], [zsh], [tcsh], etc. tags?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 at 10:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:25 | comment | added | casey | @Braiam edited. | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:25 | history | edited | casey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 318 characters in body
|
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:22 | comment | added | Braiam | Can you add that to your answer so I can upvote it? | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:22 | comment | added | casey |
@Braiam At that point you are dialect agnostic and need only the shell tag.
|
|
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:19 | comment | added | Braiam | So, you foresee a question tagged with all [bash] [zsh] [tcsh] [shell] [ksh]? | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:15 | comment | added | terdon Mod | Exactly. What seems very obvious to me is that we can't have sweeping rules like "never combine tagX and tagY". | |
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:12 | comment | added | casey |
I would then argue that each specific dialect is appropriate. bash and zsh being present would signify interest in two (somewhat compatible) dialects and disinterest in others like csh, etc.
|
|
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:11 | comment | added | terdon Mod |
I think he's asking more about multiple, specific shell tags. This question is about tagging with both bash and zsh.
|
|
| Jan 23, 2015 at 16:09 | history | answered | casey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |