Timeline for Do we need version specific tags for distributions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 21, 2014 at 16:11 | comment | added | goldilocks |
@Gilles That it was originally tagged fedora and I think that is an example of a legitimate use. I don't like the distro + version tags (fedora20); they would seem to defeat the purpose of tagging via excessive specificity.
|
|
| Aug 20, 2014 at 19:23 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | I don't understand what you're saying about unix.stackexchange.com/questions/150803/… : that it should be tagged fedora, or that it should be tagged fedora-20? | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 15:53 | comment | added | goldilocks | Yeah. By some weird coincidence I was editing that in when you added the comment O_O! | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 15:52 | comment | added | Braiam | Distros tags are ok, the problem is the fedora-20, fedora-19, fedora-18, fedora-16, rhel6 (or 5, don't remember), centos6/7, etc., your first part should go here meta.unix.stackexchange.com/questions/3037/… | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 15:48 | history | answered | goldilocks | CC BY-SA 3.0 |