Skip to main content
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

is indeed mostly if not exclusively about text editors, as the tag wiki indicates. I think I agree with renaming to — I can't think of many questions that could apply to a more general sense of “a program that modifies a file based on user interactions”.

should only be used on the few questions that are about editors in general, as opposed to about a specific editor. If you have a question about Emacs, tag it . If you have a question about Serna, tag it .

Here are some examples of questions that should have the tag:

Questions about transforming text should use the tag , not , unless the question is specifically about doing the transformation interactively and not as part of a batch job.

There's a lot of cruft in the tag, due mainly to misuse with another editor tag. There should be very few, if any, questions tagged + or +, etc.

is indeed mostly if not exclusively about text editors, as the tag wiki indicates. I think I agree with renaming to — I can't think of many questions that could apply to a more general sense of “a program that modifies a file based on user interactions”.

should only be used on the few questions that are about editors in general, as opposed to about a specific editor. If you have a question about Emacs, tag it . If you have a question about Serna, tag it .

Here are some examples of questions that should have the tag:

Questions about transforming text should use the tag , not , unless the question is specifically about doing the transformation interactively and not as part of a batch job.

There's a lot of cruft in the tag, due mainly to misuse with another editor tag. There should be very few, if any, questions tagged + or +, etc.

is indeed mostly if not exclusively about text editors, as the tag wiki indicates. I think I agree with renaming to — I can't think of many questions that could apply to a more general sense of “a program that modifies a file based on user interactions”.

should only be used on the few questions that are about editors in general, as opposed to about a specific editor. If you have a question about Emacs, tag it . If you have a question about Serna, tag it .

Here are some examples of questions that should have the tag:

Questions about transforming text should use the tag , not , unless the question is specifically about doing the transformation interactively and not as part of a batch job.

There's a lot of cruft in the tag, due mainly to misuse with another editor tag. There should be very few, if any, questions tagged + or +, etc.

Source Link

is indeed mostly if not exclusively about text editors, as the tag wiki indicates. I think I agree with renaming to — I can't think of many questions that could apply to a more general sense of “a program that modifies a file based on user interactions”.

should only be used on the few questions that are about editors in general, as opposed to about a specific editor. If you have a question about Emacs, tag it . If you have a question about Serna, tag it .

Here are some examples of questions that should have the tag:

Questions about transforming text should use the tag , not , unless the question is specifically about doing the transformation interactively and not as part of a batch job.

There's a lot of cruft in the tag, due mainly to misuse with another editor tag. There should be very few, if any, questions tagged + or +, etc.