They should probably each be short and encapsulate the idea that:
- You want a review on every facet of the code, not just some.
- The code in question works as intended.
- The code in the question is actual code, not hypothetical or pseudocode.
Phrancis brought up a good point in chat: There should also be something to the effect of
If all three criteria are met, please delete this question and post it on Code Review.
Put all that together, and you get something like this:
This question looks like it might be a pretty good fit for Code Review.SE, provided that (a) you want a full review, (b) your code is already working, and (c) you're asking for a review of concrete, real code, not abstract design (whether or not it's expressed as code). If you agree with all of those, please read about what's on topic, and, if your question fits that, delete it here and repost it on CR.
Or, in copypasta-friendly format:
This question looks like it might be a pretty good fit for [Code Review.SE](http://codereview.stackexchange.com/), provided that (a) you want a _full_ review, (b) your code is _already working_, and (c) you're asking for a review of _concrete, real code_, not abstract design (whether or not it's expressed as code). If you agree with all of those, please read about [what's on topic](http://codereview.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), and, if your question fits that, delete it here and repost it on CR.
Reminder: The character limit for comments is 600 characters. The current version is 505.