Timeline for New design & branding for Code Review
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 26, 2015 at 18:08 | history | edited | PawełStaff | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
status updated
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 21:39 | comment | added | SirPython | @glampert That is a good question. Although I do not have the tools to test it, I think that it would still look like a Q, considering that a circular shape is still being formed by the C and Q and that the Q part is only meant to be part of a Q anyway. | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 4:35 | comment | added | glampert | Maybe by increasing the length of the leg/handle it won't look like a "Q" as much... | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 4:19 | comment | added | bjb568 | Without the vertical bar of the R, they letters aren't distinguishable. | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 0:37 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon Mod | I like both though. | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 0:36 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon Mod | FWIW my wife sees it as a "Q" regardless of the angle of the break | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 0:26 | history | answered | SirPython | CC BY-SA 3.0 |