Timeline for Why is Code Review still in beta?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 29, 2014 at 21:02 | history | notice added | JamalMod | Historical significance | |
| S Sep 29, 2014 at 21:02 | history | locked | JamalMod | ||
| Sep 29, 2014 at 19:40 | comment | added | rolfl Mod | @konijn - Graduation process announced | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 19:36 | comment | added | konijn | @Rolfl what makes you say that ? | |
| Sep 29, 2014 at 19:26 | history | edited | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
graduated.
|
| Jan 27, 2014 at 20:10 | comment | added | user35408 | @JosephtheDreamer We're now at 12k questions 20k answers. Also I think SO as the biggest site on SE is not really comparable to CR. | |
| Dec 12, 2013 at 4:46 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 26, 2013 at 2:20 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Nov 26, 2013 at 2:15 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Sep 4, 2013 at 16:55 | answer | added | Mathieu Guindon | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 21:28 | comment | added | Bobson | Just to follow up, since it just came up in another question, as of now there are 21 would-be closers and 8 would-be admins, both of which are above the recommendations. | |
| Jun 24, 2012 at 5:01 | answer | added | Donald.McLean | timeline score: 44 | |
| Jun 24, 2012 at 1:55 | comment | added | Corbin | For what its' worth, a quick look at the Area 51 pages supports the theory that lack of low rep users is what's holding the site back from launch. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 15:55 | comment | added | palacsint | @JosephtheDreamer: IT Security, Role-playing Games, Theoretical Computer Science has fewer questions than Code Review and they are all launched. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 | comment | added | Joseph | At the time of writing, StackOverflow has 3M questions, while CR has 4k - That's a big gap. Also, it could be that everyone just wants code to work rather than optimize it, kinda like the "just get it done and working" habit. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 21:30 | comment | added | Corbin | blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/10/when-will-my-site-graduate is an interesting read. I suspect that's probably the reason that CR is still in beta actually. Only 5 people could vote to close, and no one would have access to mod tools (other than mods of course). | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 21:21 | comment | added | Corbin | "What's wrong with my code" questions are off topic on CR though as CR expects correct code. I browse SO fairly often, and I don't often see questions that would be better suited here, though I guess even a tiny piece of SO's traffic coming here would be a significant boost for CR :). | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 14:23 | comment | added | Fabian | I believe if Code Review would be official and there would be the ability to flag questons e.g. on SO to migrate to CR, activity would increase, as there are often questions like "whats wrong with my code", that are closed as not a real question, too localized or as not welcome to the community.. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 8:56 | comment | added | Corbin | By the standards of the StackExchange network, the CodeReview website is tiny :(. | |
| Jun 21, 2012 at 13:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/215800035638644736 | ||
| Jun 21, 2012 at 13:08 | comment | added | Myrtle | Probably because the activity is still to low. | |
| Jun 20, 2012 at 11:59 | history | asked | Fabian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |