Timeline for CoreData or code-backed UML reviews
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 13:09 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 29, 2015 at 3:43 | comment | added | rolfl Mod | @RubberDuck - I have taken the position that the source code is not the text-code, but the CoreData 'structure'. The program is compiled from that. The best way to present that 'source' is as screenshots, etc. | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 3:34 | comment | added | RubberDuck | How do you feel (with your mod hat on) about it being auto-generated code? | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 13:50 | history | answered | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |