Timeline for What is the appropriate MINIMUM length of a Code Review question?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 16, 2015 at 1:32 | answer | added | o11c | timeline score: -7 | |
| Jul 3, 2015 at 17:49 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2014 at 6:03 | answer | added | 200_successMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 2, 2014 at 15:10 | answer | added | konijn | timeline score: 16 | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 0:46 | history | edited | Dagg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 964 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 23:15 | comment | added | Incognito | I see what you're saying, it's not valid code. But that's more about feasibility of doing a review than the length per se. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 23:14 | comment | added | Dagg | @WinstonEwert I changed my mind, this one sounds like an SO question too. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 23:14 | history | edited | Dagg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1613 characters in body
|
| Feb 10, 2012 at 22:37 | comment | added | Dagg | @Incognito it's more the fact that it's incomplete and untestable than the length that bothers me. WinstonEwert: Most of the things you linked seem like SO questions for sure, not code reviews requests. To me, the thing I linked seems more like a request for a code review than an SO question, it just seems like clutter not worthy of a code review. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 20:15 | comment | added | Winston Ewert Mod | I think this relates to my question here: meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/383/… | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 20:10 | comment | added | Incognito | I would say this perspective is falling into the LOC trap of evaluating complexity. At the risk of sounding like a hand-wavy guru, "It is as long as it needs to be." Of course, if the ground's been covered already and frequently I would just direct those users that way. | |
| Feb 10, 2012 at 20:04 | history | asked | Dagg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |