Timeline for Questions should include a description of what the code does
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2013 at 12:28 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | @Jamal Can one of you add an answer for that, so that instead of seeing how it should not be handled, people can see how it should be handled? | |
| Dec 9, 2013 at 0:25 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | As codesparkle mentioned before, we can only have three close reasons at the moment. The ones we have are just fine. I do agree entirely with James. If comments don't help reveal more info from the OP, then the question can be closed with one of the existing close reasons. | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 23:02 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | @JamesKhoury "what they are asking" is often clear: "I want a review of my code". Yes, comments could be used, but I felt that we needed something "stronger". This is what I could come up with at the moment. I'd love to see other alternatives as well :) | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 22:54 | comment | added | James Khoury | I think thats what comments were designed for? asking for clarification. (we also have a close reaon: unclear what you're asking.) | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 22:42 | history | answered | Simon Forsberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |