Timeline for Codereview building blocks [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2021 at 12:43 | history | duplicates list edited | PeilonrayzMod | duplicates list edited from Create a reference for newbie common mistakes, Python - Common Improvements [closed], 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues, Common Review Quotes to Create a reference for newbie common mistakes, Python - Common Improvements [closed], 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues, Frequently posted documentation - a new zombie weapon?, Common Review Quotes | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 9:18 | comment | added | Peilonrayz Mod | I have closed your question, not because I think the idea is bad. However we've had plans in the past to do something similar, and your proposition doesn't seem like anything new. The best bet is probably to integrate your efforts with Loki on GitHub. | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 9:01 | history | duplicates list edited | PeilonrayzMod | duplicates list edited from Create a reference for newbie common mistakes, Python - Common Improvements [closed], 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues to Create a reference for newbie common mistakes, Python - Common Improvements [closed], 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues, Common Review Quotes | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:56 | comment | added | N3buchadnezzar | @TobySpeight The point is to supplement the codereviews with general principles. In your code you did X, however a common practice is Y (links to Y). See for instance how I addressed the PEP8 issue in my review here. These snippets should be building blocks one use in the review, not the entire review. | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:55 | history | edited | PeilonrayzMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:54 | history | duplicates list edited | PeilonrayzMod | duplicates list edited from 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues to Create a reference for newbie common mistakes, Python - Common Improvements [closed], 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:54 | comment | added | Toby Speight | The trouble with cut+paste reviews is that they often seem dissociated from the code under review (i.e. no specific quotes from the question code) and aren't well adapted to the varying experience levels of askers. | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:53 | history | closed | PeilonrayzMod | Duplicate of 'Canonical' questions to help address common issues | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:52 | history | edited | PeilonrayzMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:51 | answer | added | N3buchadnezzar | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 8:46 | history | asked | N3buchadnezzar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |