Player stats, sales, and reception speculation thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter user746383
  • Start date Start date
It absolutely was the case. There are plenty of graphs in this thread that prove it.
Go look at SteamDB.
Anybody can look at a yearly graph for each game, then move the year bar to the year of release.
In fact those are screenshots of those graphs that I shared above.
It shows that Civ 6 had more players on average than Civ 5 over the first couple of years after release.
Comparing the 1st 2 years of both games.
Or are you disputing SteamDB's own graphs? Surely not?
 
Go look at SteamDB.
Anybody can look at a yearly graph for each game, then move the year bar to the year of release.
In fact those are screenshots of those graphs that I shared above.
It shows that Civ 6 had more players on average than Civ 5 over the first couple of years after release.
Comparing the 1st 2 years of both games.
Or are you disputing SteamDB's own graphs? Surely not?
Here you go:

And here's the graph again, just to be safe.
1764793048495.png
 
Here you go:

And here's the graph again, just to be safe.
View attachment 749353
Go look at SteamDB.
Anybody can look at a yearly graph for each game, then move the year bar to the year of release.
In fact those are screenshots of those graphs that I shared above.
It shows that Civ 6 had more players on average than Civ 5 over the first couple of years after release.
Comparing the 1st 2 years of both games.
Or are you disputing SteamDB's own graphs? Surely not?
I think you are talking about different things

Civ 6 players during Civ 6's 1st 2wo years compared to

Civ 5 player's.....
During civ 5's first 2 years (5<6)
During Civ 6's first few years (5>6)
 
Here you go:

And here's the graph again, just to be safe.
View attachment 749353
Is there a graph with Civ VII included?
 
Is there a graph with Civ VII included?
What would this prove, except to rehash "Civ is doing worse in numbers"?

To rephrase: what question are you looking to answer?
 
Back
Top Bottom