Timeline for Simple matrix class
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2013 at 19:24 | comment | added | Corbin | Ah, seems I need to do some reading on inline. I've been procrastinating it for years now :). | |
| Jun 20, 2013 at 19:23 | history | edited | Corbin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
random bold
|
| Jun 20, 2013 at 18:05 | comment | added | Lstor |
+1. Good points! Also, like @Yuushi points out, inline is just a hint to the compiler, which is free to do what it wants. Defining a function in the class definition is the same as declaring it inline.
|
|
| Jun 20, 2013 at 10:48 | comment | added | Yuushi |
inline is basically a compiler suggestion. The compiler is free to do its own cost/benefit analysis and completely ignore it. For something as simple as a getter/setter, however, on any kind of reasonable optimization level, it's almost 100% guaranteed to be inlined automatically anyway.
|
|
| Jun 20, 2013 at 8:41 | history | answered | Corbin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |