Personally I think so.have the same thought present in Martin York' answer:
- Private Variables
-  Public
- Constuctor / Destructor
- Copy Semantics
- Move Semantics
- Swap
- Other Public Interface
- Friends
 
-  Private
- Methods as appropriate
 
When reading the code I want to know the members so I can verify that the constructors initialize them all, as a result I usually put them first. But other people prefer to put all private stuff at the bottom.
Personally I think so.
* Private Variables
* Public
    * Constuctor / Destructor
    * Copy Semantics
    * Move Semantics
    * Swap
    * Other Public Interface
    * Friends
* Private
    * Methods as appropriate
When reading the code I want to know the members so I can verify that the constructors initialize them all, as a result I usually put them first. But other people prefer to put all private stuff at the bottom.
unique_ptr(unique_ptr<T>&& uptr) noexcept
                                   //^^^^^^^^
        
unique_ptr<T>& operator=(unique_ptr<T>&& uptr) noexcept
                                                  //^^^^^^^^
The move operators should be marked as noexcept.
When used with standard containers this will enable certain optimizations. This is because if the move is noexcept then certain operations can be guaranteed to work and thus provide the strong exception guarantee.
The move operators should be marked as noexcept.
When used with standard containers this will enable certain optimizations. This is because if the move is noexcept then certain operations can be guaranteed to work and thus provide the strong exception guarantee.
 
                