Timeline for Templated string formatting
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2018 at 3:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/1047320931490836480 | ||
| Sep 30, 2018 at 13:08 | answer | added | user673679 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 2:17 | answer | added | user52292 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:41 | comment | added | lelgetrekt | Right, didn't think of that. Maybe I should get some sleep :) Btw, I like your approach. It does a lot more than I need in this particular case but definitely very interesting. | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:39 | comment | added | user52292 | Well, get for the tuple gets the index as template-parameter, not as argument, so no, you would need something a bit different (either something like my data pack or array of wrappers... too complicated I guess, the vector is fine after all). | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:36 | comment | added | lelgetrekt | I see. A tuple is probably a better solution since I wouldn’t need the to_string_vector function at all then. | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:20 | comment | added | user52292 | As for the vector, well, such solution could be too advanced for you (e.g. capturing the arguments in a tuple). You can take a look at my own attempt (quite a different level). | |
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:14 | comment | added | user52292 |
At least after } and before { when there is something else after/before: } else { and if(fmt[second] == '}') {, maybe after keywords (if (... and for () but that would be bonus :)
|
|
| S Sep 29, 2018 at 0:11 | history | suggested | chicks | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Sep 29, 2018 at 0:09 | comment | added | lelgetrekt | @firda Thanks for the feedback. I’m not a big fan of too many whitespaces. I find them more annoying than helpful. Where would you suggest I add some more? I’m using the vector so that I can directly use the parsed index to look up the value. Not sure how I could do this directly with ostream. | |
| Sep 28, 2018 at 23:53 | comment | added | user52292 |
The code could use some prettification (whitespaces) and you could possibly avoid creating the vector of strings by working directly with ostream, but it works and looks ok. Any concerns and/or future plans?
|
|
| Sep 28, 2018 at 23:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 29, 2018 at 0:11 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2018 at 21:37 | history | edited | lelgetrekt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Sep 28, 2018 at 21:10 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 28, 2018 at 23:50 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2018 at 21:05 | history | asked | lelgetrekt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |