Skip to main content
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous postprevious post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

Doesn't invalidate any answers. @Mast just described a nitpickiness about linking code between questions that I agree with.
Source Link
Trojan404
  • 838
  • 6
  • 25

See linked question for PDOIterator. No changes made.

See linked question for PDOIterator. No changes made.

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Trojan404
  • 838
  • 6
  • 25

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous postprevious post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

As always, thanks for the review!

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

@Pimgd gave some good feedback on the previous post. I've made the changes that I think best suit my application and am looking to see what people think of this implementation.

As always, thanks for the review!

deleted 74 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
200_success
  • 145.6k
  • 22
  • 191
  • 481
Loading
Source Link
Trojan404
  • 838
  • 6
  • 25
Loading