Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Isn't there already a challenge like this? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 10, 2017 at 21:13
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Related. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 10, 2017 at 21:16
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Related. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 10, 2017 at 21:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also related. This may have been the one you guys were thinking of, though it's not really a dupe (the "ID"s only have to be unique up to that point in the list) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 11, 2017 at 0:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is something like ["ba,"baa","bab"] a valid input? It does not have the same entry twice, but there is no N defined for the first string. If it is a valid input should it return ["ba$","baa","bab"], ["b$","baa","bab"], ["ba$$","baa","bab"], ["b$$","baa","bab"], any of the above, or something else? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 11, 2017 at 11:03