Message 65995 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	georg.brandl, gvanrossum, rhettinger
Date	2008-04-30.06:37:17
SpamBayes Score	0.08888872
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
The problem is with the "if you use it consistently" premise. That will not hold in an environment with legacy code, multiple programmers, lots of code in ASPN recipes and published materials, and third-party modules. A patch like this dooms Py2.6 programmers to seeing both of these forms intermixed throughout the code base. This is not a win.

The problem is with the "if you use it consistently" premise.  That 
will not hold in an environment with legacy code, multiple programmers, 
lots of code in ASPN recipes and published materials, and third-party 
modules.  A patch like this dooms Py2.6 programmers to seeing both of 
these forms intermixed throughout the code base.  This is *not* a win.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-30 06:37:26	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0888887 -> 0.08888872 recipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, georg.brandl
2008-04-30 06:37:24	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.104833 -> 0.0888887 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-04-30 06:37:23	rhettinger	link	issue2719 messages
2008-04-30 06:37:20	rhettinger	create