Message 224023 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Arfrever, arjennienhuis, barry, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, durin42, ecir.hana, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, glyph, gregory.p.smith, loewis, martin.panter, ncoghlan, [email protected], pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stendec, terry.reedy, tshepang, uau, underrun, vstinner
Date	2014-07-26.07:00:02
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Right, bytes.format was considered as part of the PEP 461 discussions, and rejected as an operation that only made sense in the text domain: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0461/#proposed-variations With PEP 461 accepted, and PEP 460 withdrawn, that means we won't be adding bytes.format and bytearray.format. Issue 20284 covers the implementation of PEP 461.

Right, bytes.format was considered as part of the PEP 461 discussions, and rejected as an operation that only made sense in the text domain: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0461/#proposed-variations

With PEP 461 accepted, and PEP 460 withdrawn, that means we won't be adding bytes.format and bytearray.format.

Issue 20284 covers the implementation of PEP 461.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-07-26 07:00:02	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, glyph, ezio.melotti, durin42, Arfrever, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, tshepang, underrun, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, [email protected], stendec
2014-07-26 07:00:02	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2014-07-26 07:00:02	ncoghlan	link	issue3982 messages
2014-07-26 07:00:02	ncoghlan	create